Image: The future for Michael Jackson's children?
37 Votes

Avatar forCherry

First buzzed by: Cherry

The future for Michael Jackson's children?

The AP's Natalie Rotman discusses what lays in store for Michael Jackson's three kids. (July 3) » Full Story on omg!

They should find out who's the real dad of those children, clearly MJ is not their biological father therefore won't had the talent.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
-2
Reply

Soon all will be forgotten!!!! Just like Elvis, John, George, Chuck, Ray, Freddie...ect.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+1
Reply

Their future is a lot more secure than the average person. They have family and a large fortune. This is like worrying about Richie Rich's future. Your own kids need your concern, not MJ's kids. There are also children out there with no parents or family at all. I don't see the media worrying about them.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+6
Reply

If anyone here has ANY decency at all - God knows - they will truly. truly, leave these precious children out of the usual hate-mongering.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+11
Reply

I think they should do what Michael would have wanted!

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+10
Reply

i think mj was a really good king of pop

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+6
Reply

I'm so sick of seeing this freak's face every time I open my goddamn homepage.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
-8
Reply

Hello I watched a couple of monutaries of Michael. And what I heard about what Joesph J. did to his own children when they got out of beat or missed a step, For the childrens sake (no disregards to their Grandmother) I hope they don't get them because of being raised with the Grandfather.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
0
Reply
ME

Prove it to me that they are realy Wako Jacko kids show me the DNA papers I think he bought them from some crack taking Brit

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
-1
Reply

Who cares whether he was the farther or not. Why is it so important? Look how mwnay men out here don't even claime there own, at least he was man enough to say they were his even if they are not. Travis A, stay off the internet then!!!

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+3
Reply

I am sure Debbie Row will get custody, she is the bio mother, as much as I have heard MJ didn't want her around and paid her off. But the girl looks like the MOM.

The drama spin will be exciting the next few months, what dirty linen will be dragged in the open.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
-2
Reply

Shopaholic, I have heard the she isn't the bio mom. Just a surrogate. Anyway, we know that he wasn't the dad.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
-2
Reply

I feel very sorry for those kids, always have, mostly because of the BAAZAR life style they had to have had having HIM for a parent. Keeping the 3 of them togeather is extremely important.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
0
Reply

the mass media is sick and degenerate, they hype this freak because they are as sick as he is...

ABC--CEO Robert Iger
NBC--CEO Jeff Zucker
FOX--CEO Peter Chernin
CBS--Chairman Leslie Moonves

funny...they are all members of the same religion too...

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
-3
Reply

Mark
I guess we will see, but I heard originally that Debbie was an assitant with a plastic surgean. Actually the surgeon is supposed to be the real father and Debbie the Mother. I think the news media is spinning some tale, but it will be fascinating to listen to l this in the next few months or year.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+1
Reply

If Debbie Rowe is the biological mother, she sold her maternity rights. What kind of human being sells their maternity rights? Now she wants them back??? Why? She didnt care when she sold her kids off, why should she be entitled to them now??

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+1
Reply

Seven
I beg your pardon, we know MJ was not an easy person to be around, what do we really know about him or why Debbie did what, I think we need to reserve judgement and find the truth and it will surface. He had a lot of money and I doubt she had more then her weekly paycheck, so he can she fight a Jackson machine? And how in the world would she have had enough money for legal fees?

MJ was a talented person, but the truth was also a disturbed indivitual.

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
0
Reply

Just a thought…..how would any of you handle the public and the media getting involve in your personal life to work on destroying the innocence of you own children after your death. And attacking your family as if they don't know who you are and what your wishes are should you die. Something I'm sure MJ, being the responsible person he was, had taken care of. And guess what, I’m sure he didn’t feel the need to come ask for anyone permission in doing this especially those who think their job of twisting the truth around make them experts.
Do you have your Will; your wishes expressed how to handle your affairs, your children? Maybe you would want the public’s opinions on this. You might not like what they had to say either…..

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
+1
Reply

i think they should just let the family of michael jackson just keep the kids the only reason why debbie is doinq it because she wanan be seen....uqh i hate that....she didnt want the kids in the first place so i dont know why she tryna get them now....
R.I.P King of Pop

posted Jul 4, 2009 |
0
Reply
Post Comment

Want to post a comment?

Just sign in and you'll be good to go

New User? Sign Up | Sign In